.jpg)
Deal or no deal.
Fintech
That is not a complaint. It is just the structural reality of the event. Three days, hundreds of stand meetings, thousands of attendees, an exhausted commercial team, and an even more exhausted set of buyers. The funnel is brutal by design, and that is a feature, not a bug. Quality conversations need triage.
Next week, the Monavate team will be at Stand 1B190 in Amsterdam, ready and waiting, to run the same playbook we always do. Listen first. Qualify quickly. Move the right conversations into a serious follow-up motion as soon as we identify them. By Friday afternoon, twenty or so of those will be on the diary for follow-up in June, and the rest we will have pointed another way to help them. It just won’t be right for us.
What separates the two piles? If you’re wondering, good. That means you can be prepared when you meet us.
This is the single biggest signal. Higher than product clarity, higher than commercial readiness, higher than anything else.
The founders and programme leads who walk away with a serious follow-up are the ones who can tell me, inside two sentences, exactly what they need from us on the regulatory side. Which licences they want us to hold on their behalf. Which ones they hold themselves. Which jurisdictions they are launching into and in what sequence. Whether they need full BIN sponsorship and managed compliance, or whether they are licensed in their own right and need a scheme-connected processor.
This sounds basic. It is not. The fact that we still have hundreds of conversations a year with businesses that have raised serious money and built sophisticated products, but cannot articulate their regulatory architecture in a stand meeting, is a signal in itself. It usually means one of two things.
Either the regulatory work has not been done internally, in which case the launch timeline is significantly further out than the pitch suggests. Or it has been done, but the person in the room is not the right person to be having the conversation, in which case we need to be talking to someone else.
Founders who say “we are still figuring out the regulatory side” are usually six months from being ready to commit. We will help them shape the thinking, and we will follow up, but the deal is not closing in this quarter.
Founders who can articulate the regulatory ask cleanly almost always have the rest of the picture in order too. The two move together.
Why does this matter so much? Because it’s our licence at stake, not yours.
Every founder at Money20/20 has a timeline. The question is whether it survives contact with payment reality.
A real timeline has four ingredients. A live launch window expressed as a quarter, not a month or a year. Money allocated to the programme, not a placeholder line in next year’s plan. A board paper or equivalent decision artefact signed off, so the partnership conversation has internal coverage. And a team identified, named, and available, so we can stand up the implementation workstream within weeks of an agreement, not just API connectivity.
If those four ingredients are in place, we can move quickly. We have stood up programmes from heads-of-terms to first transaction in under twelve weeks when the customer was ready, and our own onboarding and BIN sponsorship process was tuned for that pace. The bottleneck will not be us.
The phrase that sends shivers down our spine is “sometime later this year.” That is not a timeline. That is hope. It usually means the budget conversation has not been had internally, the execs have not signed off on the proposal, or the technical owner is also responsible for three other priorities. None of those are bad things in their own right. But they are not the basis of a decision this quarter.
If you are walking into Amsterdam wanting to leave with a real conversation, bring a real timeline. We are commercial professionals. We can tell within the first five minutes whether the timeline is real, and the meeting recalibrates accordingly.
Strategic conversations are valuable. They are not commercial conversations.
If the meeting is staffed entirely by strategy leads, product managers, and corporate development analysts, the meeting is structurally about education, not about commitment. Education matters. We will spend time on it because it is part of how we earn future business. But it is not the conversation that ends with a heads-of-terms in two weeks.
The conversations that move are the ones with someone in the room who has commercial authority and understands the reality of what it costs to run a programme. A founder. A CFO. A managing director with a budget. A head of payments who reports to the CFO and has been given a mandate. The titles vary, the substance does not. What matters is that the person across the table can negotiate, sign, and commit. Nothing in life is free.
If the decision-maker is travelling, on holiday, or out of town for the conference, that is fine, but the meeting is functionally a briefing for that person, not a meeting with them. We will adjust accordingly. Either we run a tight, structured briefing that the strategist can take back internally, or we book a follow-up call for a fortnight later when the principal is back at their desk.
Either way, we know what kind of conversation we are in. And the worst thing that happens at a stand is having a serious commercial conversation with someone who turns out to have no authority to act on it. That wastes everybody’s time, and at Money20/20, time is the only resource that does not flex.
This is not a barrier to business. It is the opposite.
If you are an early-stage founder with a strong idea, no licence yet, no budget yet, and no commercial team in place, we still want to meet you. Those conversations are among the most interesting we have at events like this, and the introductions made at this stage often turn into commercial relationships in H1 2027 when the rest of the picture comes together. This is a real part of our pipeline, and we treat it with the seriousness it deserves.
What I am describing is the difference between a conversation that goes somewhere in Q3 2026 and one that goes somewhere later. Both have value. They just need different expectation handling.
The reason I am writing this down a week before the event is so that the people who read it and recognise the three points can walk into our stand over the course of the three days, hand us their thirty-second pitch, and skip straight to the substance. We will know within five minutes whether we are working towards a heads-of-terms, a strategic introduction, or a follow-up next quarter. All three are good outcomes. They just route differently inside the commercial process.
If you do walk in ready, here is the picture on our side.
Monavate is a single, fully regulated global payments platform. Principal members of Visa, Mastercard and Discover. Authorised by the FCA. Operating across the UK and EEA. Card issuing and BIN sponsorship under our regulatory perimeter. Multi-currency accounts and IBANs. Settlement in GBP, EUR, USD, alongside USDC and EURC. Compliance is embedded into the platform, not bolted on through a third party. Modular by design, so our engagement model adapts to where the customer needs are.
We will be at Stand 1B190 for the full three days. The team is staffed for serious conversations across our four primary verticals: fintech / embedded finance, B2B travel / procurement, Web3 / digital assets, and enterprise programmes.
If you are coming to Amsterdam ready to have a focused, clear conversation, the diary is open. Find me, or find Scott, or Elliott, or Fern, or Kurt. We are easy to spot. The branding is hard to miss.
Money20/20 Europe is the highest-value commercial event in our calendar, and the one that we plan around hardest. By the time the floor opens on Tuesday morning, we will have run pre-event qualifying calls with most of the meaningful prospects, mapped the stand schedule down to fifteen-minute blocks, and prepared specific commercial responses for each of the partnerships we are most interested in advancing.
If you want to be on that schedule, the next seven days are when it gets locked in.
Email marketing@monavate.com or send me a direct message. Let me know which of the three boxes you tick, and we will book the right kind of conversation.
With Monavate you get transparency, clear expectations, and a smile. Buckle up. It’s going to be an exciting ride.
By Craig Ramsay, Chief Commercial Officer, Monavate